Skip to main content
Social Media
  • twitter
  • linkedin
Home
  • About the project
    • About the project
    • Partnerships and Collaborators
    • Coordination Unit
    • Project Management Team
    • International Network of Judges and Legal Scholars
    • Research assistants
  • Case Law Database
    • Case index
    • Database charts
  • News
    • News and announcements
    • Press newsroom
  • Resources
    • Working papers and other resources
    • Media kit
  • Contacts

When pandemic corners individual freedoms

world pandemic
UniTrentoMag

In its first year of operation, the Covid-19 Litigation database has analyzed more than two thousand litigation cases

by Elisabetta Brunelli

The difficult balance between individual freedoms and measures taken by governments to counter the Covid-19 pandemic has been discussed at all levels. In everyone's network of friends, in family circles, at school, at work, on the media, in society at large. Tones were often heated and there was a polarization of positions.

An analysis of the issues that landed in the courts on different continents was carried out by the research team of the international open access database Covid-19 Litigation, which has Paola Iamiceli of the University of Trento as scientific coordinator.
The database, in its first year of operation, selected and examined nearly two thousand cases from more than 90 countries. If in 2020 it was restrictions on freedom of movement and trade closures that found the most space in global jurisprudence, from 2021 onwards it was vaccination-related issues that catalyzed the litigation: from access to vaccines, and prioritization in favor of the most fragile people, to compulsory vaccination and thus restrictions on self-determination, with repercussions on the ability to do one's job and use services. Recent cases include the settlement reached between the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office and a nursing home accused of violating safety and prevention protocols, the decision of an Australian Supreme Court regarding the legality of measures to restrict access to offices by unvaccinated police personnel, the Indian Supreme Court's ruling on the petition to provide food and shelter to the homeless, and the decision of a French court recognizing the claim of restaurants against insurance companies for losses incurred during the pandemic.


The largest number of cases reviewed are from Europe, followed by South America (with Brazil leading the way) and Asia. India and the United States stand out as countries where some of the most intense litigation in the world emerges.

"The project does not aspire to map all available case law. The approach is selective, with a focus on decisions of the supreme courts, which, because of their content and the authority of the courts, are bound to influence jurisprudence, those that dwell most on different balancing techniques and the application of general principles, those that, in finding a measure unlawful, entrust the reasoning with a clear analysis of the interests at stake and the legal basis of the conclusions reached," Iamiceli explains.

"The selection has, in addition, taken care of the geographical distribution among countries and regions of the world and some differentiation among the topics. In fact, the purpose is not statistical, but qualitative, to provide as diverse and varied an overview as possible".


"The project can contribute to the preparation of guidelines, public policies, legislation in the face of possible future crises of global scope caused by environmental, health, geopolitical or other emergencies," notes Iamiceli.


As the first entity in the world to collect and analyze litigation information on public health interventions taken globally to counter the pandemic, the database, thanks to its news section, also allows users to keep up to date on the latest litigation and upcoming measures. For example, the research team is awaiting a ruling soon from the Constitutional Court on the legality of mandatory vaccination in Italy.

Original article available at UniTrentoMag it
Nov 30, 2022
A- A+
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • twitter
  • envelope
  • print

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Press
  4. When pandemic corners individual freedoms
home

This project and its database have been made possible with the financial support from the World Health Organization

www.covid19litigation.org is run and maintained by the University of Trento
Via Calepina 14, I-38122 Trento (Italy) — P. Iva/C.F. IT-00340520220

Social Media Links

  • twitter
  • linkedin

Terms of use

www.covid19litigation.org
Site purpose

This site is for informational use only. Case law summaries are not legal advices and may not be relied on as such. Anyone seeking for legal advice should obtain appropriate legal counsel.

Site operation

This site may not be fully up-to-date (for example, cases may be reviewed, reversed, or appealed). This site may be taken down at any time without notice. The case law summaries provided on this site may be incomplete or outdated.

Copyright

Any files provided on this site were taken from a source that is, to the University of Trento and its Partners' best knowledge, from a freely available public resource, however, any further use of such files is at the user’s responsibility.

Responsibility

This site is maintained by the University of Trento, with financial support from the World Health Organization (WHO). The University of Trento will not be responsible for any use of the site.

No endorsement

Inclusion of a case on the website does not necessarily involve a view, position, or endorsement by the University of Trento or the WHO, including with respect to any legal matter. The site is not a product of WHO and does not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the WHO.

User account menu

  • Log in

Footer menu

  • Contacts
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
  • Cookies