Skip to main content
Social Media
  • twitter
  • linkedin
Home
  • About the project
    • About the project
    • Partnerships and Collaborators
    • Coordination Unit
    • Project Management Team
    • International Network of Judges and Legal Scholars
    • Research assistants
  • Case Law Database
    • Case index
    • Database charts
  • News
    • News and announcements
    • Press newsroom
  • Contacts
Back to the previous page

India, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam, 30 April 2021, WP(C) No. 10855/2021(S)

Case overview

Share
  • linkedin
  • twitter
  • facebook
  • envelope
  • print
Country
India
Case ID
WP(C) No. 10855/2021(S)
Decision date
30 April 2021
Deciding body (English)
High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam
Type of body
Court
Type of Court (material scope)
Constitutional Court
Type of jurisdiction
Single jurisdiction system
Instance
1st Instance
Area
Health and freedom of association/public gathering/religion
Further areas addressed
Political activity / Representation
Outcome of the decision
Claim upheld

Case analisys

General Summary

The Petitioner, in the public interest, inter-alia seeks that this Court ‎declare all kinds of public and social gatherings, processions. or ‎parades in the 'name of election oriented organizational activities' by ‎the political parties, to be unconstitutional and illegal during the ‎period when the COVID-19 protocols are in force. Additionaly ‎requests as an interim measure, that such activities be banned, ‎particularly between May 1, 2021 and May 4, 2021. Case reserved ‎for verification of compliance in this regard by the Court.‎

Facts of the case

The Petitioner, in the public interest, inter-alia seeks that the High ‎Court direct the political parties and their associate organizations, ‎cited as Respondents in this case, to refrain from organizing any kind ‎of political or social activities with public gatherings, processions or ‎victory parade or any kind of gatherings, from May 1, 2021 to May 5, ‎‎2021, in connection with counting of votes and declaration of results ‎with respect to the General Election to the Kerala State Legislative ‎Assembly and in general, during the period of COVID-19 ‎regulations; violating the COVID-19 regulations issued by the ‎appropriate authorities, during the pendency of this Writ Petition.‎

Type of measure challenged
Local government measure
Measures, actions, remedies claimed
Interim measure prayed that all gatherings associated with political ‎parties be banned, particularly between May 1, 2021 and May 4, ‎‎2021.‎
Individual / collective enforcement
Individual action brought by one or more individuals or legal persons exclusively in their own interest.
Nature of the parties
  • Claimant(s)
    Private individual
  • Defendant(s)
    Public
Type of procedure
Ordinary procedures
Conclusions of the deciding body

The claim was upheld in the form of directions being issued. The ‎State is directed to take effective and requisite steps to ensure that no ‎social or political assemblies, meetings, gatherings, processions or ‎parades of any kind in violation of the COVID-19 protocols, as also ‎the directives of the Election Commission of India, both general and ‎those contained in its order dated April 27, 2021, and the mandate of ‎the Government Order dated April 26, 2021, are held anywhere in the ‎State of Kerala – including at the counting stations or offices and ‎establishments of political parties between May 1, 2021 and May 4, ‎‎2021.

Action to avert, avoid and prevent any violation of these orders under ‎the applicable laws, including the Epidemic Diseases Act and the ‎Disaster Management Act.‎

Reasoning of the deciding body

The Court stated that this writ petition cannot be adversarial since its ‎averments, in its inherent nature and tenor, present a compelling ‎public cause. The upward curve of the pandemic spread shows ‎climbing by the day, reminding all of us to act responsibly and with ‎extreme care. The 'social distancing' protocols are necessary and ‎need to be enforced effectively and unreservedly. Hence strict ‎prevention, rather than initiation of punitive action after infractions ‎is the need of the hour. The Court, learning from the noncompliance ‎that occurred during the election campaign period by directives of ‎the Election Commission of India and the Government, found it ‎necessary to issue this Order. The case was reserved for verification ‎of compliance in this regard by the Court.‎

Balancing Fundamental Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Fundamental Right(s) involved
  • Freedom of association, Public gathering, Assembly
  • Right to good administration
Fundamental Right(s) instruments (constitutional provisions, international conventions and treaties)
  • Right to Life and Personal Liberty‎, art. 21, Constitution of India‎
  • Freedom of association, art. 19 (1) (b) and (c), Constitution of India‎
Rights and freedoms specifically identified as (possibly) conflicting with the right to health
  • Health v. freedom of association / public gathering
  • Health v. free and fair election
General principle applied
Reasonableness
Balancing techniques and principles (proportionality, reasonableness, others)

The upward curve of the pandemic spread shows climbing by the ‎day, hence the need to act responsibly and with extreme care. And ‎hence the need to enforce the social distancing protocols and the ‎need to be enforced effectively and unreservedly, no matter the excuse ‎some may make against it. Therefore, the need for strict prevention, ‎and the need to issue orders by the Court.‎

Authors of the case note
  • Dr. Tania Sebastian, Assistant Professor, VIT School of Law (VITSOL), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai
  • Vishnupriya Ravichander, Undergraduate Student, VIT School of Law (VITSOL), Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai
Case identified by
VIT Chennai Research Team, VITSOL‎
Published by Chiara Naddeo on 13 May 2022

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Case Index
  3. India, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam, 30 April 2021, WP(C) No. 10855/2021(S)
home

This project and its database have been made possible with the financial support from the World Health Organization

www.covid19litigation.org is run and maintained by the University of Trento
Via Calepina 14, I-38122 Trento (Italy) — P. Iva/C.F. IT-00340520220

Social Media Links

  • twitter
  • linkedin

Terms of use

www.covid19litigation.org
Site purpose

This site is for informational use only. Case law summaries are not legal advices and may not be relied on as such. Anyone seeking for legal advice should obtain appropriate legal counsel.

Site operation

This site may not be fully up-to-date (for example, cases may be reviewed, reversed, or appealed). This site may be taken down at any time without notice. The case law summaries provided on this site may be incomplete or outdated.

Copyright

Any files provided on this site were taken from a source that is, to the University of Trento and its Partners' best knowledge, from a freely available public resource, however, any further use of such files is at the user’s responsibility.

Responsibility

This site is maintained by the University of Trento, with financial support from the World Health Organization (WHO). The University of Trento will not be responsible for any use of the site.

No endorsement

Inclusion of a case on the website does not necessarily involve a view, position, or endorsement by the University of Trento or the WHO, including with respect to any legal matter. The site is not a product of WHO and does not necessarily reflect the views or positions of the WHO.

User account menu

  • Log in

Footer menu

  • Contacts
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
  • Cookies